|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 41 post(s) |

Prince Kobol
2220
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 17:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
Cant say I am not surprised.
I have said repeatedly that CCP neither have the technical expertise, manpower and imagination available to make any changes that involves a large amount of coding.
These changes amount to somebody changing a few a numbers in a pre existing database and the odd line of code.
Damn I miss CCP Soundwave.. good thing I see him often on the Riot Forums 
|

Prince Kobol
2220
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 17:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Raliwski Ahashion wrote:Congrats for having the balls to do this CCP.
I really hope this gives people a chance in nullsec and mixes things up without having a massive 'cap fleet' boot of the big boys.
Really excited about the future of nullsec!
As Opposed to having fleets of 1000 subs caps but now with no way to counter them.. good luck with that |

Prince Kobol
2220
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 17:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Welcome to Capital Ship Gate Camps Online |

Prince Kobol
2220
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 17:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Just want to say congratulations to the Goonswarm. You have now literately won Eve. |

Prince Kobol
2220
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kismeteer wrote:Anybody who lives far from NPC space is basically untouchable now. We can hole up in Branch and nobody could touch us.
And for those who are uninformed, the reason that the null sec groups are 'crying' is because they understand null sec. I know it's hard to understand when you live in high sec, but using jump bridges and capitals are daily living up here. Hell, I traveled 30 LY just today via jump bridge, and that was just to pick up a single module. Without this, we're back to the days of daily freighter runs, which are boring as hell.
And if you want a fight? Good ******* luck. And eve without fights is a dead eve.
Like I said before.. Well done for winning Eve  |

Prince Kobol
2220
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:Finally! Great things on horizont for smaller groups.
- We are finally gonna have our nice little local brawls without fearing of 99% of New Eden
Learn to live form the space. Recruit Indy corps. Don't moan about the logistics. Your not supposed to wage war from your home to another region if its not adjecant. Deploy than attack.
Simple.
local brawls with who? |

Prince Kobol
2220
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Zloco Crendraven wrote:Finally! Great things on horizont for smaller groups.
- We are finally gonna have our nice little local brawls without fearing of 99% of New Eden
Learn to live form the space. Recruit Indy corps. Don't moan about the logistics. Your not supposed to wage war from your home to another region if its not adjecant. Deploy than attack.
Simple. local brawls with who? We in lowsec didn't blue half of EVE and made a deal with the other half. We got plenty to fight with.
but fight who exactly.. |

Prince Kobol
2222
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mizhir wrote:True Sight wrote:Bacchanalian wrote:Tell me whose babies I need to have. This is amazing. Finally a chance to shake up nullsec for the smaller fish in the pond using proper guerrilla tactics. Except, the big fish will just install a capital fleet in every region, ready to use whenever they need it, the large coalitions/alliances have enough capital (hah, punn) to simply put 500 dreads and carriers in every single low/sec/npc null in eve. the "smaller fish" won't afford that, so they will still be hell-camped. So the smaller fish will only have to deal with 500 caps rather than the entire supercap + capfleet. Sounds more manageable to me.
who other then the CFC and NC can field 500 subcaps? |

Prince Kobol
2222
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ravenssong wrote:What can I say? This is a stupid idea on it's face. Null is stagnant so lets just see what we can do to make it even more stagnant and while we are at it lets just F$&K BLOPS all to H#ll. Well done, CCP. I was wondering if I should keep three active accounts and you have just answerd that question. WAIT! This is a ploy to get people to keep multiple accounts so they can avoid these penalties, isn't it? Whatever... Closing two accounts. Will keep one for a while. 
Don't forget completely killing the T2 market |

Prince Kobol
2222
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:21:00 -
[10] - Quote
Legetus Shmoof Metallii wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Mizhir wrote:True Sight wrote:Bacchanalian wrote:Tell me whose babies I need to have. This is amazing. Finally a chance to shake up nullsec for the smaller fish in the pond using proper guerrilla tactics. Except, the big fish will just install a capital fleet in every region, ready to use whenever they need it, the large coalitions/alliances have enough capital (hah, punn) to simply put 500 dreads and carriers in every single low/sec/npc null in eve. the "smaller fish" won't afford that, so they will still be hell-camped. So the smaller fish will only have to deal with 500 caps rather than the entire supercap + capfleet. Sounds more manageable to me. who other then the CFC and NC can field 500 subcaps? HERO
Hero have never had 500 in a fleet.... |
|

Prince Kobol
2222
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
Anyway.. I have 5 accounts and they all expire in the next month or so.. don't think I will be resubbing.
Cheers CCP |

Prince Kobol
2222
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:24:00 -
[12] - Quote
Mizhir wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Mizhir wrote:True Sight wrote:Bacchanalian wrote:Tell me whose babies I need to have. This is amazing. Finally a chance to shake up nullsec for the smaller fish in the pond using proper guerrilla tactics. Except, the big fish will just install a capital fleet in every region, ready to use whenever they need it, the large coalitions/alliances have enough capital (hah, punn) to simply put 500 dreads and carriers in every single low/sec/npc null in eve. the "smaller fish" won't afford that, so they will still be hell-camped. So the smaller fish will only have to deal with 500 caps rather than the entire supercap + capfleet. Sounds more manageable to me. who other then the CFC and NC can field 500 subcaps? Dunno. But remember that if they do field their 500 man fleet they will be more vulnerable at the other end of their (renter) empire.
You mean in the systems that will be hell camped with Capitals ships |

Prince Kobol
2225
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:26:00 -
[13] - Quote
Well off to watch the football and start to get serious playing LoL since that is where all good CCP People go  |

Prince Kobol
2225
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:27:00 -
[14] - Quote
Arun Tadaruwa wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Anyway.. I have 5 accounts and they all expire in the next month or so.. don't think I will be resubbing.
Cheers CCP mail me with stuff details
Unfortunately they are all in null which you will not be able to get to with these changes.. shame |

Prince Kobol
2225
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ai Mei wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Arun Tadaruwa wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Anyway.. I have 5 accounts and they all expire in the next month or so.. don't think I will be resubbing.
Cheers CCP mail me with stuff details Unfortunately they are all in null which you will not be able to get to with these changes.. shame Try us. I was out in null before most of the players whining here joined eve online. Hell I flew an iteron 5 out to the drone regions. So yeah dont underestimate the player base who dont have capitals. We will find a way.
Really.. so why haven't you found a way so far?
What has been stopping you? |

Prince Kobol
2225
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Lyris Nairn wrote:Pine Marten wrote:Im very interested and excited about capital changes. Can't wait to see some epic null-->lowsec blobcamps get crashed by an incoming capital fleet through the gate lol Where are these "epic" camps? Please forward intel to me in game. :) edit: What the christ even posting has a timer limit now?
They don't currently exist but they sure will after these changes. |

Prince Kobol
2225
|
Posted - 2014.10.01 18:38:00 -
[17] - Quote
The Slayer wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:The Slayer wrote:Just to play Devils Advocate here a bit if you wait out the fatigue timer instead of just the jump timer you can run this exact route in around 14 hours. Yup, there's a lot of smart optimization opportunities here. To be fair I still think 14 hours is a hell of a long time to need to wait to take your cap round space. Numbers might need a touch of work.
Why, don't you feel like taking a day off your your job just so you can move your Capital Ship in a spaceship game? |

Prince Kobol
2247
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 06:24:00 -
[18] - Quote
Some do not realise that the outcome of these changes will mean.
If you think it is hard to take Sov now it will next to impossible after these changes.
I have already seen a number of ways talked about to avoid fatigue, ways which only the large alliances are able to do as they have the numbers and isk.
All they have to do is seed strategic systems with dreads and carriers, create a ring of steal and deep null will effectively be untouchable.
|

Prince Kobol
2247
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 06:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
Burl en Daire wrote:Nazri al Mahdi wrote:Burl en Daire wrote:DragonZer0 wrote:ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:Removed some off topics post. I will see to it the thread gets a good proper clean in the morning. At 127 pages this kicks in let see how many they remove from this threadnought still at -3 accounts if this hold true I would make a guess Ive seen somewhere in the 100 range of accounts being canceled. I would love to see the faces on there financial department come tomorrow morning. They will lose some but they will gain even more because small groups will start to occupy null and bring back players whom were mad about stagnation or null in general. This will bring back some of the unsubbed because there will be more content and more need for cap capable pilots to defend the territory or to work for small groups. That is a fantasy. The large groups will control the entry camps and the areas within reasonable jump range of empire. The rest will be empty. It may be a fantasy but they can't be everywhere. They are everywhere now because of how jumps mechanics are now, is it really going to be worse?
You sure about that?
Remember we are talking about groups that have so much isk its ridiculous. As well as the industrial capacity to out build anybody. There is nothing stopping them creating caches of dreads and carriers in dozens of systems along their borders. |

Prince Kobol
2249
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 06:28:00 -
[20] - Quote
marVLs wrote:That's why CCP doing this, going back to EVE that should be not some afk game for lazy kids but true fun game where a lot is happening.
The amount of cry here only shows in how bad condition was EVE
Congrats CCP, that's the best and biggest change in last years !!!
Your right it shouldn't be, there have been some amazing ideas over the years by players who have put in some real thought but all those ideas required something new to be created and as CCP has proved time and time again over the last 18 months, all they are interested in is changing a few numbers in a database and the odd line of code.
The time of CCP introducing something new is over. |
|

Prince Kobol
2249
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 06:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
Sabrina Scatterbrain wrote:Page 131.
This is what happens when CCP let's the cleaning lady make game design decisions.
Pretty sure the cleaning lady could come up with better ideas.... |

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 06:37:00 -
[22] - Quote
Shojin Askulf wrote:No reason for anyone to unsub at the moment, lets see how ccp react to this topic, more than a month before this goes live leaves a lot of time for tweaks and changes, those jumping ship because of a dev blog which has specifically been put out here to gauge reactions and gain feedback both negative and positive really do need to go play wow instead.
IF these changes go live as is then yes I can see the game changing in a lot of ways only six months down the road will we see how those changes actually effect and how different groups adapt.
Give feedback, thoughts and criticism plus ideas then take a breath and lets see what november brings, always time to push the cancel button then.
When was the last time CCP backed down from changes they had proposed? |

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 06:48:00 -
[23] - Quote
Professor Headmash wrote:looking at the amount of goons who are going to desub off the back of this, seems there won't be many of them left soon.....VFK by Christmas anyone?  Seriously though, while I can understand people's frustrations, at the same time I can't see why the majority can't see this as a good change. This is going to promote LOCAL area content for everyone. No more flying around the map fighting nameless alliances because a mate of a mate of the half brother of the FC asked for help. Placement of caps will now be key to home defence and invasion plans, people will actually have to start this thinking medium/long term instead of "it'll be fine, support fleet can be here in 10 mins'.
What local content. Caps are used for 2 major reasons, burning structures and counters to huge subcaps blobs. Without caps or the risk of having caps hot dropped on you how are you going to counter large subcap blobs?
When either CFC or NC turn up with 200+ guys flying Alpha Battleships + logi + dictors what are you going to do to counter them?
Professor Headmash wrote:Also this should help with that thing I always hear null bears moaning about, TIDI....if half the map can't get there in 10 mins, you may have to start doing more than pressing f1 and watching your guns cycle once every 10 minutes. You could actually start like, playing the game like the rest of us 
Sure Tidi is a pain but it rarely gets tot he point where it is unplayable.
Professor Headmash wrote: So in conclusion, while logistics will be slightly affected ( start making it locally instead of relaying on jita!) the fact that the carrier blob is going to be limited to an alliances local area ( unless preplanned to be moved) is nothing but a good thing. I'm sure this will promote lots of smaller wars and hopefully start to get sov shaken up a bit.
Logistics will be insane with these changes. People really do not realise how many JF trips are made everyday ferrying stuff back and forth from HS to null and back to HS.
|

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 06:50:00 -
[24] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Deych wrote:
And if there other attackers? You can't be at any place in eve in 2 hours like now. And thats awesome!
Subcaps can.
Its amazing how many people have forgotten your quite large and now after these changes invincible Baltec Fleets.
Also being able to move ridiculously fast and be immune tp bubble with interceptors from one dread and carrier cache to the next. |

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 06:51:00 -
[25] - Quote
Torgeir Hekard wrote:baltec1 wrote: How do you supply a small alliance on the outer edge of null with these changes to JF?
You blue whatever block that holds the slice of null going to empire.
So a even bigger blue doughnut that we have now.. great |

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:19:00 -
[26] - Quote
Selexid wrote:knobber Jobbler wrote:Valleria Darkmoon wrote: I'm very much afraid that if these changes go through as presented here the game will stagnate because it will be too slow. . This. Some people like the larger scale battles, in fact the only times EVE has hit the headlines and brought in more subcribers than CCP's marketing department ever has is the big fights. With these changes, these sorts of battles will likely never happen again. Those with local supercap dominance will always have a trump card and no one will be able to escalate. It begs the question of why can't CCP see what the real problem here is: Supercaps and not Carriers, Dreads, JF's or anything else with a jump drive. Dude you exhale bias... Only SC are a prob? cause the other blob has more?
But the blob will still exist.
One of the biggest reason why we have the Capital Blob was because it is only counter we have to the subcap blob.
Of course with these changes there will now be no counter to the subcap blobs. |

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
Selexid wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Selexid wrote:knobber Jobbler wrote:Valleria Darkmoon wrote: I'm very much afraid that if these changes go through as presented here the game will stagnate because it will be too slow. . This. Some people like the larger scale battles, in fact the only times EVE has hit the headlines and brought in more subcribers than CCP's marketing department ever has is the big fights. With these changes, these sorts of battles will likely never happen again. Those with local supercap dominance will always have a trump card and no one will be able to escalate. It begs the question of why can't CCP see what the real problem here is: Supercaps and not Carriers, Dreads, JF's or anything else with a jump drive. Dude you exhale bias... Only SC are a prob? cause the other blob has more? But the blob will still exist. One of the biggest reason why we have the Capital Blob was because it is only counter we have to the subcap blob. Of course with these changes there will now be no counter to the subcap blobs. Well the subcap blobs will exist, but then again wont be very fun to maintain them. Plus wont be able to be there for every timer and his grandmother on the other side of the galaxy.
Timers.. how are you going to attack somebodies system which is cyno jammed and defended with Capitals with your small subcap fleet?
|

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
Lord TGR wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Selexid wrote:knobber Jobbler wrote:Valleria Darkmoon wrote: I'm very much afraid that if these changes go through as presented here the game will stagnate because it will be too slow. . This. Some people like the larger scale battles, in fact the only times EVE has hit the headlines and brought in more subcribers than CCP's marketing department ever has is the big fights. With these changes, these sorts of battles will likely never happen again. Those with local supercap dominance will always have a trump card and no one will be able to escalate. It begs the question of why can't CCP see what the real problem here is: Supercaps and not Carriers, Dreads, JF's or anything else with a jump drive. Dude you exhale bias... Only SC are a prob? cause the other blob has more? But the blob will still exist. One of the biggest reason why we have the Capital Blob was because it is only counter we have to the subcap blob. Of course with these changes there will now be no counter to the subcap blobs. That'll be fixed if CCP redesign the sov system as well, so you really can't realistically shove 4k people into a single system and expect the rest of your space to Not Be On Fire (tm). Whether CCP is going to do this, or even if they CAN do this, now that's a different matter, but I'm cautiously optimistic. Them going for this kind of dramatic change gives me hope they're ready to consider other dramatic changes which'll make EVE a worthwhile game to play again, as opposed to what it's been the last year or so (or more, really).
It depends on what they do, you have to remember that most systems will be defended with capitals now. So how is a small gang going to attack anything that is well defended with caps? |

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:27:00 -
[29] - Quote
Aiyshimin wrote:Prince Kobol wrote: Timers.. how are you going to attack somebodies system which is cyno jammed and defended with Capitals with your small subcap fleet?
With capitals (read the devblog)
In other words you have no idea |

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:32:00 -
[30] - Quote
TheFairyClinkerBell wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Aiyshimin wrote:Prince Kobol wrote: Timers.. how are you going to attack somebodies system which is cyno jammed and defended with Capitals with your small subcap fleet?
With capitals (read the devblog) In other words you have no idea I think they are referring to the changes which would allow capitals to use gates. Cyno jammed system would be no issue, you just jump through both sub-capitals and capitals via your chosen gate to a next door system.
lmao.. yeah like to see a fleet of capitals jumping into a **** load of bubbled and then getting popped... |
|

Prince Kobol
2250
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:34:00 -
[31] - Quote
Lord TGR wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Aiyshimin wrote:Prince Kobol wrote: Timers.. how are you going to attack somebodies system which is cyno jammed and defended with Capitals with your small subcap fleet?
With capitals (read the devblog) In other words you have no idea No, capitals can still get in, they just can't cyno in (or back out in a panic if they suddenly decide (ackbar)IT'S A TRAP(/ackbar).
The FC is ever going to jump a fleet of capitals in a system that is heavily defended, gates bubbled and with no way of extracting. |

Prince Kobol
2251
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:37:00 -
[32] - Quote
Lord TGR wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:lmao.. yeah like to see a fleet of capitals jumping into a **** load of bubbled and then getting popped... Well, considering the fact that we're hopefully going towards a sov system where multiple daily fights are in order, not one huge fight every week like we're seeing now, this scenario's not going to be that big of a problem. If you've got enough force, go through, if not, go back to harassing them some more or see if you can't get down that jammer so you can set things up more to your liking.
lmao |

Prince Kobol
2251
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:39:00 -
[33] - Quote
Selexid wrote:
Well if someone is attacking a cap defended system with caps of their own, they might have subcap support and even scouts on the other side....... Gezuz man.
Tell you what.. after this change go and attack Deklein and tell me how it s goes :)
|

Prince Kobol
2251
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:42:00 -
[34] - Quote
Sigras wrote:Ferrocerium Spark wrote:Someone probably mentioned this before...
CCP please don't make new jump drive changes nightmare for logistic/industiral operations. EvE is already feels like second job so please don't make it more time consuming when it comes to using jump freighters and rorquals. because Eve didnt exist before jump freighters and rorquals right? talk about entitlement issues...
Before JF and Rorquals existed did Eve have thousands of Captial Ships and Interceptors with bubble immunity? |

Prince Kobol
2251
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:42:00 -
[35] - Quote
Lord TGR wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Lord TGR wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:lmao.. yeah like to see a fleet of capitals jumping into a **** load of bubbled and then getting popped... Well, considering the fact that we're hopefully going towards a sov system where multiple daily fights are in order, not one huge fight every week like we're seeing now, this scenario's not going to be that big of a problem. If you've got enough force, go through, if not, go back to harassing them some more or see if you can't get down that jammer so you can set things up more to your liking. lmao Let me guess, you're one of those who actually either want 4k fights, or you want to be able to hotdrop everyone from across the map whenever there's a chance of getting anything even remotely juicy. Right?
Me or TGR? |

Prince Kobol
2251
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 09:43:00 -
[36] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Selexid wrote:
Well if someone is attacking a cap defended system with caps of their own, they might have subcap support and even scouts on the other side....... Gezuz man.
Tell you what.. after this change go and attack Deklein and tell me how it s goes :) Go and attack Deklein before this change and tell me how it goes :)
The same, the only difference is right now it that it wont days to get into position were as after it will |

Prince Kobol
2254
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 10:28:00 -
[37] - Quote
Sigras wrote:Tyby wrote:Sigras wrote:Ferrocerium Spark wrote:Someone probably mentioned this before...
CCP please don't make new jump drive changes nightmare for logistic/industiral operations. EvE is already feels like second job so please don't make it more time consuming when it comes to using jump freighters and rorquals. because Eve didnt exist before jump freighters and rorquals right? talk about entitlement issues... before posting ******** comments and try to look smart, allow me to point out a small thing:before rorq and jfs existence most of the logistic was done by carriers and dreads; a dread/carrier was able to move up to about 100k m3, so yea, there is your logistic ships before jfs; but guess what? they where nerffed severall times so ppl start using the jfs on a large scale... but yea, don't let the facts stop you, keep telling us about those "funny freighter ops" that you never took part on. because eve didnt exist before carriers and dreads? How about before you try to look smart you stop and realize that some of us are still around from the days where there were no bigger ships than tier 2 battleships in game... 0.0 worked just fine, in fact people were still able to live out there without their precious force projection jump ships...
Yes they did, but back then you didn't have thousands of Capital Ships in game and just sitting in various system waiting for you.
You also didn't have Interceptors that had bubble immunity. |

Prince Kobol
2255
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 10:39:00 -
[38] - Quote
Lurifax wrote:This will change nothing for the renter empires and the blue donut!
Not quite true.
It make the Blue doughnuts even bigger whilst offering those renters in deep null even more protection |

Prince Kobol
2279
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 09:57:00 -
[39] - Quote
Riven Alteritus wrote:Dea Doughmaker wrote: current changes are stupid cos they increase idle time. this game has too much idle time. I wont be waiting 3 hours to get into engagement.
Actually... It decreases idle time for capitals, NOW you can take your ship out to rat without having to worry about getting dropped by 200 people. So cap pilots can now do more than just sit at a pos waiting for a fleet. As far as engagements it's good to see that over all, not everyone will be there. Decrease in power projection and liquidation of coalitions. Basically, CCP got tired of the coalition's bullcrap.
Most people in null hate the current meta however this will not weaken the coalitions, it will do the opposite.
Sure you can take your small fleet out with a big decrease in risk from a Cap Fleet being drop on you, instead you will have a 250+ Subcap fleet with no way to counter it and you will not be able to get any reinforcements in time and you can't attack their home system because it is defended by a massive capital fleet.
|

Prince Kobol
2279
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 10:03:00 -
[40] - Quote
Riven Alteritus wrote:Christopher Mabata wrote:
For some people its more of a "I spent 2 years training this ship, invested 3b+ into the hull and fitting alone not to mention skill books and such and im still not even perfected, and then literally overnight everything you trained it to do becomes useless, carriers were trained in most cases not to drop 300 of them on a thorax but to instead move ships over great distances where jump freighters werent viable either because of Risk or range." Its more of a huge slap in the face to capital pilots in general to pull the rug out from people like this. Im a carrier pilot yes, do i drop 300 of them ? Nope 3 at the max and thats my alts anyways, I support these changes because im settled down in a nice spot with decent jump range even at 5au and now no longer have to fear PL / BL quite as much as i did before given the fact i live a few feet from under their nose. plus the immediate benefit of low sec is no real need for extensive logistics, high sec is no more than 8 jumps away on a bad day.
Excatly... Caps were not meant to be blobed, but what did CFC, PL, BL, and the rest of the big alliances do? Exactly what caps were not meant to do. They did this to themselves, they took advantage of an exploit and abused sov space with it. Now CCP is doing something about this game breaking mechanic and unfortunately it will greatly limit the ability of jumping around a lot. But I'm sure this will be revisited and balanced out. But a door stop had to be placed on the power projection abuse taking place in TQ atm. Enough is enough.
You need to look up the definition of the word exploit.
Also this just shows how many times CCP have introduced a mechanic only to be completely turned around by the player base.
Look back over the last 5 years and with every change they have made who has benefited the most.. CFC / NC / PL
Why, because CCP are hopeless when it comes to trying to figure out what we the players will do.
People forget why Capital Fleets become the new meta.
They came about because it was the only counter to the huge Alpha Battleships that were being used at the time and they massively reduced the time it took to grind structures with millions of EHP.
Sure CCP may make changes to structures but this change does nothing to stop those huge Alpha Battleship fleets making a come back.
Only this time it will be worse.. a lot worse. |
|

Prince Kobol
2279
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 10:50:00 -
[41] - Quote
Momitsu wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:
Most people in null hate the current meta however this will not weaken the coalitions, it will do the opposite.
Sure you can take your small fleet out with a big decrease in risk from a Cap Fleet being drop on you, instead you will have a 250+ Subcap fleet with no way to counter it and you will not be able to get any reinforcements in time and you can't attack their home system because it is defended by a massive capital fleet.
And where will that lead to? Empires will shrink because you can't defend systems far away as easy as of now. Homesystems will be more strengthened. It's more difficult to wipe out someone else completely but it leaves more space for new and smaller groups with their concentrated local force. Mission accomplished Regarding those alpha fleets...you will loose them to the local capital fleets. Who wants to travel every evening a lot of jumps in a fat and slow bs? Your logistics won't be able to bring unlimited replacements to every point on the map within minutes
Don't you get it.. they will Capital Fleets defending their home systems |

Prince Kobol
2279
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 10:59:00 -
[42] - Quote
Riven Alteritus wrote:
When a game mechanic is abused, it can very well be considered an exploit. So there you have it.
It's not about the metas, it's about sov space and the inability of smaller unaffiliated groups taking sov for themselves without having the lackeys pushing them back with Nk (n being a variable) man fleets and hundreds of caps at their disposal. Now moving your entire fleet to one side of the galaxy WILL have it's effects, more than likely undefended systems. Who can take advantage of that? Anyone with the ability to gather a few tens of people to bash towers for hours before the defense shows up. So big alliances will lose out on this. HARD, and that's good. Don't like it? Too f'in bad, **** just hit the fan and you're on the receiving end.
Explain exactly how CFC / NC / PL "exploited" the Sov Mechanics.
Okay.. explain how smaller unaffiliated groups are going able challenge let alone take Sov from any of the aforementioned groups with these changes.
CFC / N3 / PL will still have the numbers, the isk and their Capital Fleets.
Their system will still be defended. The difference now is that they will just leave those hundreds of Capital Ships home and seed system after system with dreads and carriers.
They still can traverse a huge amount of space in little time using interceptors thanks to their bubble immunity and out right speed.
I know how fast and easy Interceptors can travel and mitigate any gate camps as I have used them on many occasions to do 40+ jumps though some of the most heavily defended areas of null sec.
You do realise that during the last war the CFC left a third of their force at home and not one group managed to anything against them.
So once again, this myth that their home systems will be undefended is just that .. a myth
|

Prince Kobol
2279
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 11:41:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ain Depran wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:[quote=Riven Alteritus]
CFC / N3 / PL will still have the numbers, the isk and their Capital Fleets.
Will they? How many of the renters are going to stay under the alliance controls? Logistics to the Drone Regions for instance is going to become a pain in the butt and costs/time for hauling might mean many renter corps pull out. How much isk per month will the alliances lose from this I wonder? Markets are so bad in null its almost impossible to even sell ore, however I guess this could well pick up if it means limited hauling to Jita eh? Still, you could always just build everything in null and seed the markets and make a killing....oh, apart from the moon goon being in the wrong place and the distinct lack of mexallon...... Cap ships through gates?? que EVERY gate being bubbled permanently. Damn I love this game :)
Every one of them because there space will become even more secure because its such a massive pain to get to. They are going to be able to break out their carriers to rat with because the risk of anybody going to all that trouble to try and drop a fleet on them is going to be very slim.
I know for fact that both the CFC and NC have already mapped out new routes and are already in the mist of preparing for this change.
Yes logistics is going to be horrible but they have so many people, so many alts that they can cope, they will be able to adapt. like they always have.
How do you think the smaller entities who do not have all those alts are going to cope?
As for isk.. are you really that blind?
All that Moon Goo, Tier 4 PI and rare ore, where do you think it comes from and who owns all that space?
All they will do is push the prices up. The people who will pay are those having to buy because they do not own any moons or are able to mine any rare ores.
What will most likely happen is that those people who own all the moons, who have access to null sec ores will be able to field T2 Fleets after T2 Fleets and those who don't wont be able to afford them thus making the gulf even bigger.
|

Prince Kobol
2279
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 13:21:00 -
[44] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, I just can't wait for them to be released, the main null sov holders to not change at all, and in fact defend themselves easier and fight each other less, then the screams of "IT DIDN'T WORK CCP" coming from all the idiots that think this is going to change null. It's going to be amazing.
Its often I agree with Lucas but he has it bang on.
That is thing, people who traditionally oppose each are agreeing that this will only make things worse. |

Prince Kobol
2280
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 13:50:00 -
[45] - Quote
Riven Alteritus wrote:It's ridiculous how dumb most of you are. "What if supers roam?" THE ****??? "Skill points I'm crying over about!!!" Stuff happens, move and adapt. "PL this BL that CFC turdcake!" Good! Dissolve the coalitions. POWER PROJECTION YOU FOOLS! It's to control power projection. No-one cares about your tears, about your complaints. null is a dead fish fight for 10 systems a year. Boring, uneventful... Lack of power projection means smaller sov space. THINK FOR ONCE and stop complaining. GIVE INPUT and complain less. And if you do give input, THINK about it before posting. This cry thread is getting old quick with different people crying over the same issue. We know, you're all concerned about the micro scale of things and are completely blind to the macro effects because of your tears. Here's a tissue, there's the corner, you got 5 to man up and mature.  
People have been giving CCP idea for the last 3 years and they haven't listened once.. |

Prince Kobol
2280
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 13:51:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:Miriya Zakalwe wrote:What's truly funny about this is that even the unintended side effects are obvious and will be bad. You think Minnie/Amarr FW space is a hotdrop ghetto *now*? Look at a map and think about what PL and SC will do for fun when *forced* to only drop in a 5LY radius.
Faction war already sucked, but this is going to make the FW area hotdrop frequency a lot higher as blops and other ships are moved to where they are still fun and effective.
Seriously - did anyone put five minutes of thought into this? Anyone actually playing the game, I mean?
Meanwhile, those Black Frog prices are gonna get hilarious - assuming they don't just close doors for good. You think PL's focus is going to be living in amamake? PRO You don't know a thing about FW. As PL already knows, most of FW exists in a meta detached from non-FW. There are encounters on the gates, but non-fw entities do not run down timers, so usually anything that was going to happen in a site between intra-FW groups does, but the best an outside entity can hope for is to 3rd party it. Otherwise they just avoid the fight entirely. When things get heated in fw space, PL and anyone else is always welcome to the yard. It's always a blast. More pew for the pew gods. I've spent years on and off in that exact space and you have no clue what you're talking about. Also, it only takes two brain cells rubbing together to realize black frog's services just became significantly more valuable to the average player.
Black Frog have already stated they might they might stop because how much this effects their service. |

Prince Kobol
2281
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 14:33:00 -
[47] - Quote
Aiyshimin wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, I just can't wait for them to be released, the main null sov holders to not change at all, and in fact defend themselves easier and fight each other less, then the screams of "IT DIDN'T WORK CCP" coming from all the idiots that think this is going to change null. It's going to be amazing. Its often I agree with Lucas but he has it bang on. That is thing, people who traditionally oppose each are agreeing that this will only make things worse. - massive nerf to capital ship power projection - nerf to structure HP - occupancy based sov Everyone except the dumbest ones see that these will certainly change nullsec.
Then you are dumb... |

Prince Kobol
2282
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 15:12:00 -
[48] - Quote
davet517 wrote:Steve Jobs once said "It's not the customer's job to know what they want". It's applicable here. Eve is a sandbox folks. The game play is emergent. When CCP makes a change like this, they can't predict with great accuracy what will happen. They might have a theory about what players will do, but they have no facts. No matter how smart you think you are, you have no facts either. Your theory may differ from theirs.
One thing is certain in a game like this. Stasis is bad. The current mechanics + player culture = two coalitions controlling a map that, for most 0.0 dwellers, is a sea of blue as far as the eye can see. In other words, the current mechanics have played themselves out, and this is the result. So, they theory-crafted some changes that they believe will shake things up. Maybe they will, and maybe they won't. It'll have to play out, and what happens will be the results of thousands of individual decisions that players make about how to adapt.
Nobody knows for sure what will happen. That's a hell of a lot better, when you're playing a game, than knowing for sure what will happen. Interesting times ahead.
We do know what will happen, yourselves, CFC and NC will keep the agreements you have and life will continue as normal.
I have seen a number of posts from PL members supporting this and I am not surprised as it makes you even stronger. |

Prince Kobol
2282
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 15:13:00 -
[49] - Quote
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:davet517 wrote:Steve Jobs once said "It's not the customer's job to know what they want". It's applicable here. Eve is a sandbox folks. The game play is emergent. When CCP makes a change like this, they can't predict with great accuracy what will happen. They might have a theory about what players will do, but they have no facts. No matter how smart you think you are, you have no facts either. Your theory may differ from theirs.
One thing is certain in a game like this. Stasis is bad. The current mechanics + player culture = two coalitions controlling a map that, for most 0.0 dwellers, is a sea of blue as far as the eye can see. In other words, the current mechanics have played themselves out, and this is the result. So, they theory-crafted some changes that they believe will shake things up. Maybe they will, and maybe they won't. It'll have to play out, and what happens will be the results of thousands of individual decisions that players make about how to adapt.
Nobody knows for sure what will happen. That's a hell of a lot better, when you're playing a game, than knowing for sure what will happen. Interesting times ahead. No you dont get it, the world is ending!!!! These changes will simultaneously do nothing and ruin errything!!!!1 
Yss, it will not change the power that current entities have, it will not give smaller entities a chance to take Sov and it will only hurt smaller groups |

Prince Kobol
2282
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 15:15:00 -
[50] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Prince Kobol wrote: Yss, it will not change the power that current entities have, it will not give smaller entities a chance to take Sov and it will only hurt smaller groups
What smaller entities are you talking about, exactly?
All these smaller entities that people think are suddenly going to magically appear out of nowhere and do something |
|

Prince Kobol
2282
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 15:21:00 -
[51] - Quote
davet517 wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:
We do know what will happen, yourselves, CFC and NC will keep the agreements you have and life will continue as normal.
I have seen a number of posts from PL members supporting this and I am not surprised as it makes you even stronger.
You seem to know more about how we're taking this change than I do, so I guess I'll have to defer to your superior insider information, and continue preparing for how to adapt.
Then you need pay more attention in corp chat  |

Prince Kobol
2283
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 15:24:00 -
[52] - Quote
Glathull wrote:This is the most amazing change of all time, including Incarna.
I love it.
Remind me again how Incarna worked out for subscriptions |

Prince Kobol
2283
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 15:27:00 -
[53] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:davet517 wrote:Steve Jobs once said "It's not the customer's job to know what they want". Well Steve Jobs was a moron, so I'd take anything he said with a pinch of salt. davet517 wrote:It's applicable here. Eve is a sandbox folks. The game play is emergent. When CCP makes a change like this, they can't predict with great accuracy what will happen. They might have a theory about what players will do, but they have no facts. No matter how smart you think you are, you have no facts either. Your theory may differ from theirs. Well then they need to hire better staff, since players have predicted the response to almost every change that's ever been made with staggering accuracy.
Well.. the CFC have that is for sure  |

Prince Kobol
2283
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 15:55:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ninteen Seventy-Nine wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Glathull wrote:This is the most amazing change of all time, including Incarna.
I love it. Remind me again how Incarna worked out for subscriptions The straws They are being grasped
What straws.. he said Incarna was great and I asked a simple question |

Prince Kobol
2283
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 17:04:00 -
[55] - Quote
SanDooD wrote:
But it won't. That's the problem. Revenue should come from new subscriptions, sales of PLEX, etc. It shouldn't come from extortion. Forcing capital pilots to have 28-30 alts will not net them new revenue, because for every new cyno/capital jumper account they get, they will lose an existing player probably. If you think some of the old players won't quit over this, think again.
How many new accounts did they get after B-R battle? How many of those stayed active and are patient enough to wait to get into titan. Do you think these people started playing EVE because they think it's the best MMO out there? They want to be part of the fights like that one. Here comes CCP Nullsec Team to crush their dreams.
My Business Hat tells me that I should keep my existing customers first before I try to get new ones, and extorting more money from my existing customers is not a good customer relationship.
This so bloody much.
CCP thrive on the media attention they get after massive fight. These changes will make damn sure that you will never see a fight like B-R5RB were an estimated $300,000 in ships were lost and over 7,500 people were involved.
Fights like at 6VDT-H were 2591 ships were destroyed including 621 capsules, a fight that effectively killed one of the largest alliances in the game.
The Battle at Asakai can never happen again. I fight that started by a mistake. A fight that involved over 3000 people. A fight that overall cost the parties involved over 700 billion isk.
|

Prince Kobol
2284
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 17:14:00 -
[56] - Quote
Arsine Mayhem wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Eigenvalue wrote:But you don't see that and the reason is obvious - the lowbears are scared to enter null, that's why they live in low sec. You guys may be getting fights, but Razor has decided to deploy to low sec because ~blue donut agreement~ doesn't allow them to get enough pvp in null sec. So, yeah, when entities decide to fight and have fun then they have fights and have fun. When "The masters of 0.0" blue each other up and make it boring for their members to play game, then subscriptions lapse, and .... This. And in case you haven't noticed on your login screen, the numbers of players has been down, by quite a bit. CCP is going to do what they think is in the best interest of the game overall, not for some self serving null carebear. Get over it.
What.. you mean the self serving null carebears that have been telling CCP for the last 3 years that Sov Mechanics were horrible broken.
That Capital Fleets need to die.
That null sec Industry needs to be vastly improved.
That most of null sec is not worth fighting for?
|

Prince Kobol
2286
|
Posted - 2014.10.05 07:47:00 -
[57] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:Hmmm, the thread slowed down. Seems the CFC whine train ran out of steam, perhaps they just ran out of tears to shed.
Have a closer look at who is posting, very few goons are against this, you know why, because it benefits them more then anybody else.
They have the manpower to cope with the changes. They have the Capital ships to defend their home systems, they have the isk to seed system after system with carriers and dreads and they are going to have even more isk after these changes.
|

Prince Kobol
2287
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 12:41:00 -
[58] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Gregor Parud wrote:Azami Nevinyrall wrote:http://evemaps.dotlan.net/system/YA0-XJ
Station is named "CCP Fire Greyscale"
Something tells me they're butthurt...
Actually, alot of GSF stations has been renamed to that... Goons won't at all be affected by these changes, in fact they'll just grow stronger. They also aren't posting in this thread crying their eyes out. From Chribba: http://eve-search.com/stats/thread/376666-1
your point..
Most of goonswarm members who have posted in this thread are not crying but are in fact laughing because they know that these changes will only make them stronger.
|

Prince Kobol
2287
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 13:02:00 -
[59] - Quote
You guys really make me laugh..
CFC have proved time and time again that they can quite easily win engagements without the use of Capital Ships.
Hell only yesterday they obliterated a nulli BS Fleet worth 36bil using bombers.
I really can not wait until a few weeks after this patch to see all the people laughing now saying this will really hurt the likes of CFC / NC / PL only to realise it has just made things worse. |

Prince Kobol
2287
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 13:25:00 -
[60] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:You guys really make me laugh..
CFC have proved time and time again that they can quite easily win engagements without the use of Capital Ships.
Hell only yesterday they obliterated a nulli BS Fleet worth 36bil using bombers.
I really can not wait until a few weeks after this patch to see all the people laughing now saying this will really hurt the likes of CFC / NC / PL only to realise it has just made things worse. You are so sweet  If the goonies etc adapt well, then good for them. It does not mean that they are happy with the proposed changes - why else the constant refrain of: I'm going to quit with my zillions of accounts in this thread?
Well it should be difficult for you to find a couple of posts by goonswarm members saying they are quitting then  |
|

Prince Kobol
2287
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 13:38:00 -
[61] - Quote
Summer Isle wrote:It seems this thread has slowed down by quite a bit. No matters, I suppose, since it's already the largest thread ever created within EVE.
Granted, I don't think it's the most amount of posts on a specific topic. I'm pretty sure the umpteen-million "nerf cloaking" threads take that by a rather large margin.
Just wait until after this release.. then you will get many threads with tears and people like me, Jenn and Lucas saying we told you so  |
|
|
|